Weekly Winners is back!!
After a year and a half Weekly Winners is back! For now. For a more detailed explanation on why I was gone, and why I'm back click here. This is Weekly Winners, so in this article, it's all about the cards! And talking about a long time ago: all three winners of this week are from sets that are 10 years old. But hey, they may be from some time ago, they're still relevant.
So, once again, just in time for FNM, I'll tell you now what cards will be the talk of the town tonight!
#1 Pyrohemia $4.69 (+388.54%)
What a great week to be back! This week I can present you one of my favourite cards as the weekly winner:
But, 2018 is calling. And so is the new set:
With the release of
The enrage ability is not new, but the simple fact that with that new dino you can activate
Also good to mention that with
And there comes
Fun fact: the first actual card that practically has the enrage ability is
#2 Runed Halo $40.99 (+78.22%)
Whenever there is a big tournament, all eyes are on the top players and most of all, on the quarter finals, semi's and the big final. And when that final is a mirror match, like in last weekend's SCG Modern Open in Columbus, this creates extra interest in certain cards. People scour their collections and look if they are also able to get that top tier deck together.
Even while
But since it was on a high price level even before the spike, I really wonder if the card can hold its current price tag. When UWR control keeps doing well, maybe. Unless the card is reprinted, it will always be a powerful, fairly unique card, with a limited print run. And that always warrants a $10+ price tag.
#3 Resplendent Mentor $2.89 (+542.22%)
And another card from
By adding some other EDH/ casual gems you can make this decent combo very janky.
But like all janky, 3 piece combo's around, it still has to come together. Especially in EDH. Yes, if you luck out and draw all your three combo pieces, you have a good deck. But most of the time, you don't. Or, as someone in the White House put it so eloquently:
Who// What// When// Where// Why
I'll explain in short how I choose the top 3 of the week. With previous instalments of the Weekly Winners, I got a lot of questions about this, and also, a fair amount of angry people that did not agree with my choices. So, I thought it was a good idea to write a little about my choices for weekly winners.
Little background
Before going in to the card choices, I like to share that I don't really like talking about myself in the Weekly Winners. A personal pun here and there is no problem of course, but I see to many Magic articles that read like personal diary entries of the writers. About what they like, feel, think or did. My goal for the Weekly Winners is to write a neutral, but fun piece of information that explains why a certain card has increased in value. To word it differently: the Weekly Winners is not about me, but about the cards, and about giving you background information on why price changes occur.
And since I'm sharing, I'll share another two things with you as well. First of all, I'm not a US citizen. Also, English is not my native tongue. I'm actually from The Netherlands, and currently living in Amsterdam. So I will make mistakes in my spelling and language. I tend to overlook typos, but sometimes I'm just not aware of them.
Second: I'm not a speculator. The last time I bought single cards was about 7 months ago, for my Grixis Delver sideboard. Spikes and speculation hurt me just as they hurt you. And sometimes I profit of off them, just like you when you happen to have some obscure card that is now suddenly $10 or even higher.
Card Choices
So now on to the card choices and a little background on how I make my choices.
First of all, it is highly subjective, there is no mathemethical calculation being done or some standard procedure I keep onto. The first thing I look for is the card that has the biggest gain in %, and in $. It is easy for a $0.15 card to spike 500%. Eternal format staples can fluctuate more in absolute dollars but don't have a big percental difference. So, the winners are not just the top 3 biggest gainers.
Next thing I look for is a story. What can I tell about a card? If something looks like 'just a buyout' I usually don't cover it. Unless the buyout in itself is an interesting story to tell.
By deciding on 'the story'; I also try to satisfy people that play different formats when I can. This week 2 cards that are played in EDH/casual are featured, and 1 modern staple. That's just 2,5 formats, no Standard, no Legacy. It happens. These three cards stood out this week, also because two of them have a link with the release of a new set this week.
Sometimes when I decide what three cards to focus on, I choose on personal ground. For instance, if a Standard staple and Legacy staple are tied for the #3 spot (one gets covered, the other one doesn't) I will lean towards the Legacy staple, simply because I know more about the format. I read up on Standard, but I don't play it often. I can write a better story about Legacy. But don't be alarmed, this is not an automatic thing: if the Standard card is the better story, I'll go with that.
To conclude, I'll give some insight in my thoughts about choosing the #1. Usually I go with the card that has gained the most in %. But this week is already an exception to this.
Having said that. The #1 slot in Weekly Winners is reserved for the biggest percental winner. Unless other cards are a better story. Maybe I have to rephrase that: unless I, subjectively decide it to be a better story.